Public echoes Leicester Police A.C.C Bannister in calling for Greville Janner Trail Review

Public outrage into the decision not to prosecute Lord Janner, suspected of a string of child sexual abuse crimes, has reached the desk of Assistant Chief Constable Roger Bannister in the form of an open letter penned by joe public.  Joe, a writer for The Metropolitan Peace and campaigner against child abuse who was himself charged with a serious sexual offence in 2012 and who faced trial, and was then acquitted by a jury at The Old Bailey in a high profile media case, spoke out in the wake of senior officers raising concerns about the decision after Alison Saunders, the Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), announced 86-year-old Lord Janner of Braunstone was too ill with Alzheimer’s disease to stand trial.

After an on line campaign was announced Members of the Public are set to flood the CPS with complaints, emails and telephone calls demanding that the decision be reversed and Janner be charged. This comes after the glaring contradiction between the way decisions are being made by the CPS with regard to prosecuting ‘influential men of politics’ and the ordinary members of the public.

In announcing Lord Janner would not be charged, the DPP through Alison Saunders revealed details of previous allegations against Janner and said he should have been charged with offences against children following two previous police investigations in 1991 and 2002.

She said: “It is a matter of deep regret that the decisions in relation to the previous investigations were as they were.

She went on “Had the previous decisions been to prosecute, as they should have been, Lord Janner would have had the opportunity to challenge the evidence and defend himself through the trial process, with a jury ultimately deciding on his guilt or innocence some years ago.”.

In response to this statement joe public lists dozens of elderly convicted paedophiles that had claimed to be suffering from dementia, some of whom were ‘too ill to attend court’  but were CONVICTED in their absence and sentenced. Thus showing that yet again, there is a law for the public which the privileged and political seem to evade with ease.

In an open letter sent via facebook to Leicester Police joe eloquently ties together just how wrong this decision is and shows the glaring contradiction in how a historical sexual abuse allegation leveled at him at the time was  pursued in the complete opposite way to how the allegation against the peer was pursued.  In fact joe’s question stands. Why was he treated differently to Janner?.  It is a question that deserves an answer.

The letter reads…

Dear Leicester Police Service.
Please would you be kind enough to pass this communication to Assistant Chief Constable of Leicester Roger Bannister. The contents are not restricted and are open to all to read.

Dear Asst.Chief Constable Roger Bannister,                                                  

You have shown immense courage in your convictions by speaking out publicly at the disgraceful decision made by the Assistant DPP of the CPS Alison Saunders’s over whether to charge Greville Janner with the crimes his victims allege or not. The Public appreciate how frustrating it must be for you as police constables as the decision itself flies in the face of our very fabric on policing and that is that there must be one Law and that Law must, and I repeat, MUST be applied fairly and equally to ALL be they members of the public or Members of Parliament. It must be a Jury that decides the outcome of weighing the evidence and NOT the CPS.  In making a decision such as the one not to press ahead with charges in the face of substantial evidence is a gross overstepping of the CPS’s remit. This decision must NOT be allowed to stand.

I fear however that speaking out against the decision will not be enough. Not for you and certainly not for the British public.  This decision MUST be overturned and the accused in this matter, and the others brewing just below the surface, must face trial for these alleged crimes. Not to have them prosecuted is sending a grave message to the British Public..

I wanted to touch on some of the glaring hypocrisies that stand out in the case as to whether Janner is, or should be, prosecuted or not. The CPS has cited ‘dementia’ and age. 

Here, for your perusal, are a list of convictions handed down to paedophiles who hold no office and were, until uncovered, ‘ordinary’ members of the public. These now convicted paedophiles all claimed to have dementia. As you can see by the cases below, having dementia or being elderly  presented NO BAR in these cases.  Can you please explain to me why the CPS, in all the cases listed below, proceeded and secured convictions but yet are refusing to act in the same fashion, or by the same criteria in the case of Lord Janner accused of serial heinous crimes against children?  Or if you cannot provide the answer maybe consider forwarding this communique to Alison Saunders for her attention. I have a very personal interest in understanding how the CPS came to their conclusion which I will go into later.

There have been a number of recent court cases in which defendants with dementia have been jailed, and Lord Janner himself has previously called for Nazi war criminals to be put on trial regardless of their age or frailty’s.

However, now that the boot is on the other foot, it appears that it is all change for Janner.

Adam Simmonds, Police and Crime Commissioner for Northamptonshire, is quoted to have said that the decision not to charge Lord Janner on Thursday made it a ‘dark day for our justice system’.

72-year-old Dementia sufferer is jailed for “appalling” child sex offences committed 40 years ago http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/20…/…/07/brian-ash-millendreath/

Paedophile suffered from dementia & Alzheimer’s disease at TIME of offences – Guilty http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/…/03/12/douglas-turner-barnsta…/

Paedophile with severe dementia found guilty of abusing 6 under-age girls in a trial held in his absence http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/…/michael-collingwood-tedburn-…/

Paedophile with dementia was remanded in custody – Found guilty at trial & then jailed http://wp.me/p2gE9F-3UV

Eastham paedophile had vascular problems and resulting dementia – Found guilty in court http://wp.me/p2gE9F-41C

Paedophile suffers from dementia & heart problems – Found guilty & jailed http://wp.me/p2gE9F-6We

Judge convicts paedophile with korsakoff’s syndrome, a form of dementia. http://wp.me/p2gE9F-71N

Paedophile with dementia walks free from court after abusing girls as young as two http://wp.me/p2gE9F-8Kv

Suffers from dementia,mentally incapable of standing trial – Not be able to understand proceedings – Found guilty http://wp.me/p2gE9F-aiE

82-year-old Belfast pensioner with dementia found guilty http://wp.me/p2gE9F-fn5

Wick/Bristol paedophile Teacher recently assessed for dementia found guilty & jailed http://wp.me/p2gE9F-g3j

78-year-old Cornton paedophile who has dementia & is nearly deaf found guilty and jailed http://wp.me/p2gE9F-hgl

Harworth paedophile with vascular dementia found Guilty -
However walked free from court http://wp.me/p2gE9F-hhU

Chippenham/London paedophile Teacher molested children – suffered from dementia – Found guilty & jailed for 7 years http://wp.me/p2gE9F-huk

Stoke paedophile with fronto-temporal dementia – Found guilty http://wp.me/p2gE9F-hz9

Stanmore paedophile suffered from dementia & Alzheimer’s – Found guilty & jailed http://wp.me/p2gE9F-iI2

Swindon paedophile systematically sexually abused a young girl in the 1970s – Had dementia & found Guilty http://wp.me/p2gE9F-iOG

Huddersfield paedophile unfit to plead to charges against him cause of dementia BUT was tried & found guilty by jury http://wp.me/p2gE9F-jhB

Paedophile who abused two boys over 30 years ago detained indefinitely under hospital order – Had dementia – GUILTY http://wp.me/p2gE9F-gf8 

All information cited above comes from ukpaedos-exposed.com

Joe went on…

As you can see dementia, nor age issues, are mitigating circumstances when it comes to the prosecution of members of the public who commit these acts.  All of the above were either elderly, and suffering from some form of dementia or other. That did not stop the CPS prosecuting. Charges were pressed and trials were held.
That is how it is when there is clear evidence of a crime being committed by a member of the public and sometimes even when there is no evidence but simply an allegation. Therefore Lords, Politicians and the Power Elite MUST also be held to account in the exact same fashion.  There can only be One Law for all. Anything else is unacceptable in Britain today. Janner MUST be charged.

The faith of the British public in it’s traditional ‘Bobbies’ is being sorely tested in these difficult times. Paedophiles are rife within our Houses of Parliament and are furiously legislating to protect themselves and each other. Those attempting to stall and cover up these crimes that stretch to the very top of our political party trees, all of them, and they are enabled by the Home Office, and that Office also happens to be the Office that the Police are responsible to.   That is a conflict of interests and a big one at that.
Many of the British public are aghast that your, and other Constables, hands are being tied at every level in an effort to protect these paedphiles within the ‘corridors of power’ from the Justice system. I would like to ask what you, and your other senior ranking colleagues across the country, intend to do about it? Police investigations into these, and other, investigations must not be interfered with in this way and especially by those who would seek to cover up these heinous crimes against children. 

The British public so desperately wants to be proud of it’s police service, but more and more often are left ashamed by their brutality, complacency with political and banking crimes, and corruption, and now the ineffectualness of the combined forces in holding those alleged to be responsible for these perverse attacks on our children to account.

By speaking out publicly on this matter you have reawakened hope in the British public that there are decent, honest, and dedicated coppers out there but I fear, personally, that you will succumb to ‘pressures from above’ and either conform with the CPS decision, or resign.  Neither of those options incidentally are acceptable to the public. Conformity for obvious reasons and resignation because all too often we see good people resigning from positions of authority due to not agreeing with the policy. That helps no one, except maybe you get out of a tight spot.

The British public deserve to have people, who take a stance on their behalf, in their corner fighting for them and equality in policing..  The British Public, sir, will support you in that quest. 

We want a just and fair police service. We want a just and fair police service that WORKS FOR US. But most of all we want a just and fair police service that arrests all the bad guys no matter what their privilege or status may be.  
Of late it is becoming clearer and clearer that we, the British Public, do not have a Police Service. The Peers, Politicians, Corporations, and Banks have a police service.  They are your ‘trusted partners’.  How can the police have trusted partners in councils, and public office when that trust is so often broken with examples of crimes against children being rife right through those and other institutions?.

Joe went on to explain the circumstances surrounding his arrest and prosecution for an alleged sexual assault that was alleged to have occurred at Occupy London site, St Paul’s Cathedral…. he said…

“Three years ago I faced a serious historical sexual assault allegation.  The allegation was made by a bitter ex. I was arrested, (to allow for a PROMPT and EFFECTIVE investigation and I was arrested almost immediately. I was strip searched, held in a cell for almost 9 hours and then interviewed at length. I was then bailed. During my interview I disclosed several pieces of evidence including social media communication, a witness named by the complainant (who’s statement contradicting the woman’s claims was ignored by police only to be presented by the defence), and an established time line of events that proved incontrovertibly that the allegation was fabricated.

Having presented all these details I expected, when I surrendered to bail, to be handed ‘no further action’.  The evidence I had presented, after all, was very compelling. To my horror the case was not closed with no further action, I was charged.

When I questioned WHY I was being charged I received the reply from the Police Service involved that I had to be charged ….’so as to be seen to be sympathetic to the alleged victim and so that a Jury could acquit.’  Foolishly I believed this statement. It was even common knowledge between the prosecutor, my defence, the DS bringing the case, and the JUDGE before and during the case that this case was going to fail. Of course it was as I had incontrovertible proof that the woman was lying!.

For the four days I was on trial at the OLD BAILEY my face was plastered all over the front pages of the national (cough) ‘news’ papers complete with sensationalist headlines and slurs. The Public gallery was packed in the first two days with old school tabloid hacks with their bright red puffy faces and pinstriped white collar shirts. That is when the prosecution makes it’s case. For the remaining two days, whilst I presented my defence, there were but a handful of my close friends in court and the obligatory junior reporters. In the four days I was on trial I didn’t read the papers I didn’t need to. The public had been sold on the sensation and all presumed my guilt.  That is trial by media. So whilst I was being tried in the Old Bailey in person, my character was being tried in the national papers.

Now one might question why the police and CPS pursued a case so vigorously knowing full well that there was no evidence other than that presented by the defence, and therefore no chance of a conviction.  Well the answer is quite simple, I am, and was then, an activist for change, and an advocate of fundamental freedoms. I took an very active and high profile roll in ensuring that Occupy London was heard when trying to highlight the Banking crimes that, you, the UK Police Service still refuse to investigate and I was, at that time, and still an anti child abuse campaigner.

The full weight of the Judicial system was brought to bear in me simply because I had caused a storm for the Corporation City of London and it’s Banking Cartels. This was precisely why the against me case was pursued with such vigor, It wasn’t even about convicting me, it was about assassinating my character in an effort to demoralize those campaigning against the City.

and the Police Service investigating the case?. Yes, the City of London. The same City of London privately funded by the Corporation of the City of London and Banks.
This was not just an unjust prosecution, it was a malicious prosecution. But it was a prosecution and I had to endure it. Now it’s Janner’s turn. Leon Brittan evaded Justice with his death, and so too did Savile. Are we to wait until they all die one by one before their crimes will ever be addressed?.

On the fourth and final day of the trial at the Old Bailey I was cleared of any wrong doing. I was found Not Guilty by a jury of my peers consisting of NINE women and three men.  However, thanks very much to a two inch column on page 12 of the Daily Fail the British public didn’t get to hear the news. Fortunately the truth of what happened to me is now widely understood.  I would have sought legal action but an obvious obstacle to that idea was the fact that I would be arguing against a system that by the very nature of clearing me, works. But that’s just it. It only works if all citizens are treated equally in the eyes of the Law, but it is becoming apparent that all citixzens aren’t treated equally and that is what must be addressed.
The crux of the matter is that if joe public, who is just your average member of the public, had to face a trial and a possibly long custodial sentence if convicted, on simply an allegation of sexual assault alone, then so must Members of Parliament and the Power Elite.”

There can be NO two tier policing policy in this country.  Not now. Not ever and it falls to you sir, for speaking out publicly, to address the issue. I have yet to have a response from any senior ranking police constable requesting an audience so that I may ask why was the Law different for me?.  I want an answer to that because so far all I see is a handful of ‘celebrity’ titbits being thrown to us in the search for paedophiles. It has taken less than  two years in many of the ‘celebrity’ child abuse cases, from initial arrest to prosecution and in some cases conviction, but the arrest of MP’s?  That just isn’t happening, not one single arrest and again the British Public can see this. The British Public are also acutely aware now of the use of a vey ambiguous Act passed by the European Parliament ion 2005 which grants IMMUNITY from legal proceedings for any Euro MP.  British Mp’s are Euro MP’s.  This immunity, like being prosecuted is an illness, is allowing paedphiles posing as politicians to rape, torture and murder children and our damned police services either stand back and watch or get actively involved in the process by aiding and abetting the stealing of children by the State.  My God man, what has become of our once admired and respected bobbies?  Are you all just going to sit there and do nothing?. What is ACPO’s stance on this flagrant use of legislation to allow a politician, unless caught in the act, to be immune from any questioning, arrest, of legal proceedings.  That is just madness. If the UK Police Service is complicit in these happenings and are funded by the very people committing all of these acts, then they effectively work for the banks, the politicians, and ultimately the paedophiles.

One thing that would be quite apparent if this were to be the situation, and that is that the one body you do not work for, but yet in the same breath proudly exclaim that you do as we are ‘policed by consent’, is the British Public.

I hate to break this to you but the UK Police Service is supposed to be a PUBLIC SERVICE, provided BY US, FOR US…  and if you do not work for us, but instead the corporations and the politicians, then we do not have a Police Service and much of the Public is starting to realise that if the UK Police Service isn’t there as a public service, then it isn’t there for the public.  The result will be that the mantra so often spouted by Theresa May about Britain being proud that we have a police service that ‘polices by consent’, will be worthless and we will slip into a fascist regime with the very people we elected to serve and protect us doing the exact opposite.  Can’t the senior ranks of the police services see that?.

Your statement has helped reassure the public, for the time being, that there are a number of Constables out there of senior, and junior, ranks who are speaking out against these blatantly unlawful decisions, but it is not enough.  The British Public needs to hear the same message from ALL Chief Constables and ACC’s in ALL areas, including The Met and Greater Manchester.

The UK Police Service belongs on the side of the British Public. It needs to, once again, become admired, respected and trusted. That can only happen if you arrest AND prosecute the alleged paedophiles in public office. 

To allow (the government via) the CPS the power to veto any case they choose using, at best, dubious reasons, and at worst totally spurious reasons, is to fail us, the British public.

The British Public are the ones that have always believed in your abilities to carry out your duties professionally and sensitively. We are the ones that come to your aid when you are threatened or in peril, and we are the ones who make your job easier to do on a day to day basis.  But if the Janner case, and others like it involving the rich, and the powerful, and the politicians are not prosecuted to the same degree that joe public has, and would, be then all that is about to change.

The British Public are looking to you all to do your jobs and arrest the bad guys, but then see to it that those bad guys stand trial for their crimes. Many people forget that in days gone by the latter was your job too. Now that job is being done by the CPS, and done extremely badly and with apparent and glaring bias.,.  Those obstructing these investigations, including officials working at the CPS, the Prime Minister David Cameron with his failure to grant a cast iron guarantee to whistle blowers, should be arrested themselves and questioned as, from what the British Public can see, they are all guilty of perverting the course of Justice in a current case. That is caught in the Act and that they cannot hide behind legislation set to keep them immune from prosecution.

I apologise for the lengthy communication but I felt that you needed to know that the British Public are watching, waiting, and hoping, that your comments regarding the decision of the CPS has been noted by the CPS and are acted upon as YOU sir, are echoing what the entire British public are thinking. 

However, it is not enough just to voice your disgust at this ‘wholly perverse decision’, it needs the full weight of every senior rank in every county and city constabulary to man up and demand that the Police get the final say in matters of trial..
Furthermore, the victims, with your assistance, should now be challenging this decision using the Victim’s Right to Review…. something I, and the rest of the British public, are eagerly awaiting you do.

I would hope that you would be speaking to, Ms Saunders’s boss the Head of the CPS who is called Baljit Ubhey OBE who will have authority over this decision and impressing on him just how angry the British public are.  He can be contacted via this email address and the information on the Victim Right to Review is listed below

Email: London [email protected]
Victims Right to Review
http://www.cps.gov.uk/vi…/victims_right_to_review/index.html

Once again, thank you for making your anger known in your public comments. It has not gone unnoticed by the British public. I do hope that your comments do not fall on deaf ears or that you are forced into a position of resigning over the issue.  As I said, that is the last thing that the British public needs. We need men like you IN OFFICE and bringing Justice to our judicial system and Justice to the child victims and to see to it that these alleged monsters feel the long arm of the Law and are punished to the fullest extent of the Law for their crimes.. But there needs to be a lot more of you, and speaking out longer and louder.  The British Public will support that, and those who step forward and up to the plate in the name of justice for the child victims.

Yours sincerely,

joe public.

As this article was posted two more news articles were coming to light that tackled the subject of Lord Janner and his evasion of charges. 
David Icke http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/lord-janner-child-abuse-scandal-now-theresa-may-turns-heat-on-dpp-over-botched-case/
and
The Daily Mail  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3045318/Lord-Janner-child-abuse-scandal-Theresa-turns-heat-DPP-botched-case.html