TradCatKnight: Vatican II, Mohammed and Islam

Vatican II, Mohammed and Islam

Vatican II, Mohammed and Islam

Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate

http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2017/04/vatican-ii-mohammed-and-islam.html

The authors of Vatican II documents with the spirit of aggiornamento encoded heresies in positive and ambiguous formulations under the aegis of the Council and the Pope. Nobody could dare to point out hidden fraud! They committed the gravest crime – an abuse of ecclesiastical and divine authority against the Church and against God!

The spirit of Vatican II decoded after the fruits of 50 years

Vatican II (1962-1965) with the programme of aggiornamento “anchored, codified, received into the heart of the Western Church the whole mentality of Modernism, liberalism and pandering, flexible morals”. The spirit of lies undermined all dogmas by implanting ambiguous terms. In the post-conciliar period, these ambiguous formulations and terms became a stepping stone to open promotion of heresies. An example is the decree on ecumenism. It combines heresy with truth. Paragraph 11 contains a heresy. It reads: “The way and method in which the Catholic faith is expressed should never become an obstacle to dialogue with our brethren (non-Catholics and pagans – see NA).” In the next sentence, however, it sets a contradictory condition: “It is, of course, essential that the doctrine should be clearly presented in its entirety.” The result is that the truth is unfeasible, serves only as an alibi, and, as a consequence, the document embodies the spirit of heresy. That was its secret purpose. This principle is used in many conciliar decrees.

Heretical statements in the decree Nostra Aetate (NA) (see http://vkpatriarhat.org.ua/en/?p=11689)

Quote: “Thus, in Hinduism people explore the divine mystery … and recourse to God in confidence and love.”

Response: Hinduism does not worship one God, the Creator, but it is a polytheistic religion – the worship of more than one god. The cow is worshipped as a goddess, and so are even snakes! Hinduism does not make man free but holds him under the sway of error, in the darkness of unbelief and often in passions and immorality. Hindus do not have recourse to God but to demons (cf. 1Cor 10:20).

Quote: “Buddhism proposes a way of life by which people can, with confidence and trust, attain a state of perfect liberation and reach supreme illumination either through their own efforts or with divine help.”

Response: All men are in bondage to original sin and can achieve forgiveness of sins, “perfect liberation and supreme illumination” only through Jesus Christ, and that through repentance and conversion. Through their own efforts and with divine help, which in paganism means with the help of demons – angels of light, they can only reach supremely false illumination and false liberation.

Quote: “So, too, other religions … outline a programme of life covering doctrine, moral precepts and sacred rites.”

Response: Pagan religions with their sacred rites sacrifice to demons and not to God (1Cor 10:20). Their doctrine prevents man from recognizing and receiving not only the objective truth but also the revealed truth! They represent a system rejecting Christ – the Truth! One has to discern that there is one God but this does not change the fact about the existence of Satan, the fallen angel, and fallen angels – demons. Pagan cults worship them but do not worship the true supreme God (Rom 1:16-25). God created all men but is not worshipped by all, and this is true about Islam. “Whoever denies the Son does not have the Father either.” (1Jo 2:23)

Quote: “The Catholic Church rejects nothing of what is true and holy in these religions.”

Response: What in particular is true in paganism and what is false? Reincarnation erroneously denies the personal and true God, the immortal human soul, God’s judgment, Christ’s redemptive death for our sins, heaven and hell! Koan is no illumination but self-delusion and loss of reason. Nirvana and enlightenment is actually demonic possession!

Quote: “It (the Church) regards with sincere reverence those ways of conduct and of life, those precepts and teachings…”

Response: If it has a regard but no true criticism, it is a sign of the loss of judgment and reason as well as the loss of the saving faith! One can say here: “What communion has light with darkness? And what accord has Christ with Belial?” (2Cor 6:14-15)

Read more »

If you enjoy the TradCatKnight blogs, please recommend above as a contributor!

Read more and watch related video at article link above.

TradCatKnight